In the early 2000s, Britney Spears was found mentally unstable and appointed guardians, who at that time were her father Jamie Spears and lawyer Andrew Wallet. The latter had been managing Britney’s real estate for some time.
Recently, Andrew commented on the scandalous guardianship of the singer and suggested that custody of the singer would be maintained for the rest of her life. He noted that the star is still not allowed to sign documents and make important decisions, her finances are also controlled.
The main question is whether guardianship is in Britney’s best interests. I personally believe that guardianship is in her best interests. Protection of her assets is important, and to do so the right to manage them must be preserved, – Wallet said. He noted that many people have been in care all their lives.
I’m not saying it is bound to happen to Britney, but it can happen, – Andrew clarified.
It is important to note that the main problem in the history of custody of Britney is not the fact of custody itself, but the fact that her father allegedly abuses his authority. This year Spears began to fight with her father through court, trying to deprive him of this status. Since the fall of last year, her assistant Jody Montgomery has been taking over the guardianship for several months, and Britney would like to secure that authority for her. But in August, the guardian status returned to Jamie Spears. Britney’s attorneys emphasize that she does not give up guardianship in general and even recognizes the need for it, but does not want her father to be the guardian.